A prominant Asian businessman has criticized Singapore’s public funding of what he called “elitist, intentionally avant-garde work which ‘may have no relevance at all’ outside of the West. He suggested that public funding of such ‘so-called art installations’ had become ‘disconnected from the community’ which they purport to engage with. Globalisation, he said, was a ‘double-edged sword’, tending to homogenise indigenous art movements while making them known to the world.”