The heirs contend that the judge was biased. “There is no justification for calling New Brunswick’s and the gallery’s greatest benefactor a ‘con artist ‘ who committed a ‘gargantuan fraud’ and was comparable to Goebbels,” say the heirs.
The heirs contend that the judge was biased. “There is no justification for calling New Brunswick’s and the gallery’s greatest benefactor a ‘con artist ‘ who committed a ‘gargantuan fraud’ and was comparable to Goebbels,” say the heirs.