Is it all a feint to ensure that the focus is off Levine as a sexual predator and instead focused on Peter Gelb, the general manager of the Met? Or do Levine’s legal complaints have a basis in a disagreement between the two powerful men?
Is it all a feint to ensure that the focus is off Levine as a sexual predator and instead focused on Peter Gelb, the general manager of the Met? Or do Levine’s legal complaints have a basis in a disagreement between the two powerful men?