Financial Times to Lay Off Up to 60 Staffers

FT management has begun consultation with employees about the redundancies, with staff in the editorial library and the managing editor’s office at risk of losing their jobs. Other employees who face possible redundancy include staff from advertising sales, finance, IT, conferences and marketing. No journalists will be made redundant, but FT insiders fear the loss of librarians will affect editorial quality.”

Are Living Legends Off-Limits To Criticism?

In reviewing Tina Turner’s L.A. concert last week, Ann Powers observed that the 68-year-old rock goddess’s singing just ain’t what it used to be. And she got walloped for it. (Samples of reader abuse are included.) “For many fans,” Powers writes, “just being in the presence of an elder artist confers residual magic… This takes us into the realm of pop music as religious ritual. Who are we to judge the gods and goddesses?”

Miami’s Carnival Arsht Center Gets It Together

“After a budget-busting inaugural year marked by financial crises, empty seats and community outrage, the publicly owned Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts has closed out a second year that stands in stark contrast to the first. The budget is balanced, attendance has nearly doubled and elected officials no longer dress down leaders of the center in public meetings.”

The Jewel of Medina Just Isn’t That Incendiary

Carlin Romano: “Its departures from solid historical facts… lie within the normal ambit of historical fiction. Its sympathies tilt completely toward Muhammad and Aisha. Controversial aspects – Aisha’s possible flirtatiousness and fibbing, her jealousy, her sharp tongue… all stem from Islamic history itself. Only a Muslim who rejected Muhammad’s lifelong insistence that he was a man like other men could find The Jewel of Medina objectionable or anti-Islam.”

Kansas City Symphony’s Lawsuit For State Funding Thrown Out

A Missouri judge has rejected the orchestra’s claim to dedicated monies from the state’s arts fund. He ruled both that the Missouri government is protected by sovereign immunity and that laws dedicating funding are not binding. “While there are many statutes with seeming ‘promises’ by the Legislature as to how revenues from a particular tax will be spent, these ‘promises’ are but empty words that have no legal consequence.”